ESGTree

Categories
ESGTREE

Diversity Equity & Inclusion: Preparing Private Equity for DEI Reporting

Diversity Equity & Inclusion: Preparing Private Equity for DEI Reporting

Share:

Diversity,Equity & Inclusion Reporting software tool

When the Institutional Limited Partners Association (ILPA) updated its diversity and inclusion guidelines for GPs last year, it signalled to the private equity industry that the ‘S’ of ESG would now be of increasing scrutiny and importance to investors. 

ILPA expanded its Due Diligence Questionnaire (DDQ) and Diversity Metrics Template to provide for more robust reporting on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) and a strengthening of reporting mechanisms. In the words of ILPA CEO Steve Nelson, “While DEI is a comparatively newer area of focus for Limited Partners (LPs), the industry is experiencing a sea change in LPs’ appetite for more nuanced information about team diversity and General Partner (GP) actions to advance DEI.”

ILPA expanded its Due Diligence Questionnaire (DDQ) and Diversity Metrics template to provide for more robust reporting on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) and a strengthening of reporting mechanisms. In the words of ILPA CEO Steve Nelson, “While DEI is a comparatively newer area of focus for LPs, the industry is experiencing a sea change in LPs’ appetite for more nuanced information about team diversity and GP actions to advance DEI.”

DEI Reporting: What the Market Has Shown Us:

  • Tracking diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) has gained traction among private equity (PE) firms and LPs. This development is part of a larger societal trend. In recent years, global social movements centered on DEI have sparked reexamination in every part of society, including business. In fact, research shows that DEI is good for business, regardless of geography.

     

  • In the private markets industry, LPs are placing increasing importance on PE firms’ diversity metrics in making allocation decisions. In response, the PE industry is making steady progress on improving the diversity of its workforce. In fact, research by the Institutional Allocators for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (a consortium of asset owners looking to drive DEI in the asset management industry) found that DEI in private equity (PE) can potentially improve performance and reduce risk across portfolios. 
  • Other studies also bode well for DEI and PE. The International Finance Corporation (IFC), for example, found that “venture capital-backed companies in emerging markets with gender-balanced leadership teams had a 1.6 times increase in their step-up valuation, or change in valuation between rounds of financing.”

     

  • Our own experience corroborates this trend. When automating ESG frameworks, such as the ESG Data Convergence Initiative, we have had to provide additional reporting add-ons on DEI to satisfy our clients’ investor demand for this information.

DEI Reporting: Where to Start?

Before embedding strong ‘S’ policies into an organization, two things are paramount: asking the right questions and collecting the right data.  As a baseline, one may ask: How can my business maximize the quality of life for its people (i.e., its employees, management, suppliers and community), particularly for marginalized groups (such as women or minorities)? How will my DEI efforts minimize risk and safeguard my reputation as an equitable organization?

Benchmarking and DEI Reporting - Giving Data Meaning

  • At the 2022 Invest Canada conference in Ottawa this May, ESGTree was posed a pertinent question on benchmarking and DEI: should DEI policies account for region? In other words, how should DEI efforts in a homogenous region differ from those in a diverse metropolitan area? Indeed, questions of benchmarking – in other words, of contextualizing information – give meaning to raw data in ways that account for ground realities and therefore impact strategy and performance. 

  • Asking the right questions will help organizations move beyond token DEI initiatives that serve only to tick off the boxes investors ask for. Embedding genuine DEI policies into a business – beyond boosting company morale, culture and output – minimizes reputational risk. A workplace that embraces and celebrates a diverse community of stakeholders, while emphasizing mutual respect, is less likely to have to battle harassment, racial or other scandals later down the line, or spend precious time putting out fires while trying to do business. In the super-information age, the court of public opinion is the only one that matters. And it moves fast.

DEI Reporting and the Power of Automation

  • With so much at stake, from investor appetite to reputation management to hiring and retaining the right talent, a majority of organizations are still struggling to effectively manage and analyze their ‘S’ data.

     

  • 55% of companies surveyed by Ernst and Young reported that they still used excel spreadsheets to manage their ESG data. The 72 respondents surveyed included some of the largest corporations in the United States. At the same time, respondents acknowledged how serious ESG reporting is becoming and anticipated devoting much more time to it.

     

  • This gap between action and intention is easier to understand when accounting for the current difficulties that companies face when collecting and analyzing ESG data. The ESG industry, though exponentially expanding, is still in the midst of regulating and standardizing metrics and reporting mechanisms. ESG managers (a job that in itself is only now rapidly growing) are faced with various reporting frameworks and different requirements for different investors, with little guidance on how to implement them. Hiring external consultants to handle this data is both expensive and time-consuming.  In such an environment, GPs can stay ahead of the curve, and save themselves much hassle and headache, by automating their data and using cloud-based systems to collect, analyze and report it.

     

  • In fact, ILPA’s third Diversity in Action (DIA) roundtable in August 2024 revealed that, while firms can take a variety of approaches to collecting and aggregating ESG and DEI data, many firms that lack the resources to build robust internal data collection platforms are frequently leveraging service providers and consultants to aid in the process. 

The road toward equity in PE is long, but sustained efforts on actions that can fast-track progress will help the industry realize its goals. LPs can further strengthen the industry’s dedication to DEI and, by turning these commitments into action, PE firms can sharpen the competitive advantage that diversity offers.

Difficulties in ESG data reporting

 This gap between action and intention is easier to understand when accounting for the current difficulties that companies face when collecting and analyzing ESG data. The ESG industry, though exponentially expanding, is still in the midst of regulating and standardizing metrics and reporting mechanisms. ESG managers (a job that in itself is only now rapidly growing) are faced with various reporting frameworks and different requirements for different investors, with little guidance on how to implement them. Hiring external consultants to handle this data is both expensive and time-consuming.  

ESGTree highly recommends that organizations harness the power of the cloud and data automation to keep on top of investor demand, prepare for future regulatory requirements, minimize reputational risk, and gain the most from inclusive policies. 

Who Should the Economy Really Serve?

Who Should the Economy Really Serve?

The rallying cry of the American Revolution – no taxation without representation – is today taken as self-evident but deserves a re-examination in light of the climate crisis and sustainable…

Summary

Share:

DEI Reporting: What the Market Has Shown Us:

DEI Reporting: Where to Start?

DEI Reporting and the Power of Automation

Difficulties in ESG data reporting

Categories
ESGTREE

Carbon Accounting 2022 and Beyond

Carbon Accounting 2022 and Beyond

Share:

In February of this year, private equity multinational The Carlyle Group publicly committed to hitting net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 across its entire portfolio. The commitment makes much sense; private equity and venture capital firms are ideally suited to lead the charge towards net zero. Unlike their public market asset management peers, they are more directly involved in their portfolio companies, often holding board seats, and therefore able to influence ESG strategy. Because their role is to help their companies grow, we believe it is imperative for private capital firms to build carbon accounting into the DNA of their investments.

A proactive stance on carbon policy minimizes three types of risk: 

Transition risk:  As portfolio companies grow, carbon accounting will become more unwieldy. Business operations will become more complex and likely involve a greater number of stakeholders. It will be far easier to account for emissions before this happens, and also minimize any transitional risk companies undergo during their growth phase and as they move from a high carbon to a low carbon life cycle.

Reputational Risk:  If a company is perceived to disregard the environment or greenwash its operations, the power of technology and social media swiftly amplifies this news. Millennial and Generation Z consumers are more conscientious than their forebears. Deloitte’s Global Millennial Survey 2021 found climate change and environmental protection to be their number one concern, with 60% of respondents disbelieving promises by the business community to prioritise either. These generations are willing to take a pay cut to work for environmentally responsible companies.

Regulatory Risk:  The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed rules requiring publicly traded companies to disclose climate-related financial information. It is fair to assume that eventually this information will have to be disclosed for private companies as well. In Canada, federally regulated financial institutions must report climate data in line with the Taskforce on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) from 2024 onwards.

The problem with carbon offsets

Carbon offsets, already a controversial market, are hard to estimate and costly to audit. Nor are they entirely accurate, making it difficult to assess whether one is buying enough credits to offset emissions. Portfolio companies can save themselves this hassle by embedding a low carbon culture into the very foundations of their operations.

So where to start?

Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials (PCAF)

Launched in 2019, PCAF is a global partnership of financial institutions that aims to standardize the data collection, assessment and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions associated with their loans and investments i.e., their financed emissions.

The PCAF standard is ideal to implement because it comes from within the industry itself. Rather than reinvent the wheel, its recommendations and requirements complement existing frameworks such as TCFD, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB). Some prominent North American PCAF members include Bank of America, BlackRock, CIBC, Bank of Montreal, FinDev Canada, Citi Group and Morgan Stanley. In November 2021, the London (UK)-based BC Partners became the first private equity firm to join the partnership.

Without automation, PCAF becomes yet another (necessary) reporting burden that companies have to contend with. Through cloud-based automation, companies can simplify the process by inputting basic carbon-related information and generating automatic reports for limited partners and other stakeholders. ESGTree is currently working with Canadian banks to automate their PCAF data.

But getting that information isn’t always easy. Carbon emissions are hard to calculate and usually require the engagement of consultants to appraise an organization’s Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions – a process both costly and time consuming

Types of Reported Emissions

Scope 1: Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions produced by operations that are directly controlled or owned by the reporting company

Scope 2: GHG emissions produced indirectly from the reporting company’s outside purchase of necessities such as electricity, heating or cooling

Scope 3: Indirect GHG emissions resulting from the supply chain of the reporting company

Carbon calculation

ESGTree’s Carbon Calculator was devised to do away with this encumbrance. Now staff members themselves can generate these figures using basic information about company operations. Our clients have reported a 70% reduction in the time it takes to calculate this information.

When it comes to carbon accounting, Benjamin Franklin’s old adage proves doubly sound: don’t put off until tomorrow what you can do today. Don’t listen to Oscar Wilde on this one.

ESGTree’s Carbon Calculator, along with its various ESG reporting tools, simplifies the otherwise expensive and arduous task of carbon footprint reporting. By inputting readily available information into our system, corporations can streamline this process and effectively comply with investor reporting requirements.

Click here to learn more about ESGTree’s ESG Data Management & Reporting Software for Financial Institutions

ESG Is Here to Stay!

ESG Is Here to Stay!

By 2025, ESG assets are estimated to exceed USD$50 trillion. In other words, one third of Assets Under Management (AUM) will be classified as ESG assets in the next three…

Summary

Share:

Why are PEs and VCs suited to lead the charge towards net zero?

What type of risk does sound carbon accounting minimize?

What are the challenges of carbon offsets?

What are scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions?

Accelerate ESG reporting for investors, while
creating value for portfolio companies.

Categories
ESGTREE

Three Things We’ve Learned Working with Impact Investors on ESG Reporting

Three Things We’ve Learned Working with Impact Investors on ESG Reporting

Share:

By market size alone, impact investing might be far smaller than ESG investing, but its unique profile makes it a critical part of sustainable finance. Its obligation to actively “do good” and contribute towards a positive net change in the communities it engages, rather than concern itself purely with risk mitigation, means that the pursuit of ESG isn’t left to the machinations of pure capitalism. In fact, its unique “do active good” mandate serves as an important “best practices” guide when it comes to ESG reporting and measurement in general. This is because we’ve learned that impact investors can optimize their ESG data using the three major methods below:

Three ways to optimize ESG data

- Gaining insight from historical data

Impact investors commonly sit on a wealth of data, spanning years if not decades. By taking this data, cleaning it, and analyzing it, ESGTree helps its impact clients glean longitudinal insights on the overall performance of portfolio companies over a span of time. Using cloud-based tech and advanced data analytic tools, we provide time series and real-time analysis of ESG data, along with relevant filters for benchmarking purposes (something that cannot be achieved outside the cloud).

Historical ESG data may show incremental improvements on a yearly basis, but taken as part of a bigger – or longer – picture, these accumulated improvements could signify big change and meaningful long-term trends. In addition to making a case for how consistently a portfolio company has cut its carbon footprint, or empowered minority workers, or stayed ahead of legislation, these long-term trends can inform future ESG strategy.

- Correctly attributing ESG data

Given their unique position to “do active good,” impact investors want to know how their involvement with portfolio companies directly results in their ESG outcomes. In other words, they ask: to what extent can our efforts be attributed to the improved ESG data of our portfolio companies?

If, for example, an impact investment fund acquires 10 new portfolio companies that happen to heavily employ women in management positions, the increased “S” value of the overall portfolio cannot be correctly attributed to the fund’s input. By attributing the data correctly, rather than claiming a company’s achievements as automatically their own, impact investors track how their investments actively bring about change over time. This brings two big benefits: a) a fund is shielded from ESG failures that cannot be attributed to it, and b) their correctly attributed, data-backed achievements are a valuable tool in the fundraising process.

- Benchmarking your data

In order for impact investors to make reasonable claims about their contributions to ESG, they need to be able to assess a portfolio company’s progress in relation to other comparable companies in the region. Parsing data in relation to region, industry, company size and other relevant factors, and following these figures over time, allows investors to track progress against local and international standards and measurements.

Benchmarking is also a useful way to stay ahead of ESG regulations. By now, it is accepted knowledge that ESG ratings are suboptimal. In 2022, we sit on the cusp of new regulation and processes for standardizing disclosures. Already, frameworks such as the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) have set this important and inevitable process in motion. Closer to home, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has also acknowledged the shortcomings of current ESG rating methods and is looking into criteria to properly define a “green” financial product. For data to mean something, it cannot exist in a vacuum.

What these three lessons on impact measurement and reporting hold in common is the idea of storytelling. What story is my data telling me? And now can I read this story properly? To do this, impact investors must use historical data to reveal long-term ESG insights, attribute the relevant ESG gains to their efforts, and assess their ESG standing as part of a bigger regional and industry-wide picture. Using these three measurement methods, private equity and venture capital impact investors will get the most out of their data.

ESG regulations

Benchmarking is also a useful way to stay ahead of ESG regulations. By now, it is accepted knowledge that ESG ratings are suboptimal. In 2022, we sit on the cusp of new regulation and processes for standardizing disclosures. Already, frameworks such as the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) have set this important and inevitable process in motion. Closer to home, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has also acknowledged the shortcomings of current ESG rating methods and is looking into criteria to properly define a “green” financial product. For data to mean something, it cannot exist in a vacuum.

Data that tells a story

What these three lessons on impact measurement and reporting hold in common is the idea of storytelling. What story is my data telling me? And now can I read this story properly? To do this, impact investors must use historical data to reveal long-term ESG insights, attribute the relevant ESG gains to their efforts, and assess their ESG standing as part of a bigger regional and industry-wide picture. Using these three measurement methods, private equity and venture capital impact investors will get the most out of their ESG data management.

ESGTree provides one of the most advanced ESG data platforms specifically geared to private equity (PE) and venture capital (VS) investors. Our team collectively brings a wealth of experience in sustainability management, ESG management and tech.

ESG Is Here to Stay!

ESG Is Here to Stay!

By 2025, ESG assets are estimated to exceed USD$50 trillion. In other words, one third of Assets Under Management (AUM) will be classified as ESG assets in the next three…

Summary

Share:

What makes private equity unique?

How can historical data be used by impact investors?

What are the benefits of attribution of ESG data?

What is the benefit of benchmarking ESG data?

Accelerate ESG reporting for investors, while
creating value for portfolio companies.
Categories
ESGTREE

Who Should the Economy Really Serve?

Who Should the Economy Really Serve?

Share:

The rallying cry of the American Revolution – no taxation without representation – is today taken as self-evident but deserves a re-examination in light of the climate crisis and sustainable development and ESG efforts. In fact, it could be argued that the whole field of sustainability is an example of taxation without representation.

Who is taxed without representation?

The environment is taxed (without representation) by rampant consumerism, habitat destruction and the relatively unchecked power of big business interests. Society is taxed (without representation) by inequality, injustice and poor working conditions. And governments claim that they are taxed by constant criticism.

Let’s try to put this tax into numbers: McKinsey and Company found that global financial stock was set to surpass $200 trillion by 2010, and probably hovers close to $300 trillion today. Needless to say, this stock has grown faster than world GDP, mostly as a result of outpaced debt expansion. But our natural capital is only valued at $17-33 trillion. So who is paying the difference?

One could argue the difference is supplied by the “tax” paid by environment and society. After all, someone has to pay for this rapid financial expansion. And yet, management theory as a discipline largely ignores environmental or “non-human” actors. This has created an equal and opposite reaction within the field of sustainability management, with environmentalists leading the charge against the financial sector.

The roots of financial institutions

We should not forget that the roots of financial institutions were socially motivated and originally focused on the provision of liquidity, allocation of capital and facilitation of economic and social progress. Given the central and dominant role business plays in every society, should it not then be responsible to that society?

Elaborating on the idea that finance should serve society first, Jim Hawly and Jon Lukomnik assert that the primary purpose of finance in the asset management industry is not to make money, but rather that making money is a necessary condition of the industry. They write, “Absent profit, the industry would cease to exist and the risk mitigation and intermediation, which do serve society, would stop. But we should not confuse an essential input into self-perpetuation for the industry, with the industry’s societal purpose, which is to serve the provider of the funds it manages.”

Our current institutions and economic models are designed around neo-classical economics and our current model of innovation is contradictory to sustainable development. The role of management is to provide an enabling environment for innovation to flourish from the bottom-up, to build bridges between sustainability and finance. Governments and the private sector must give sustainable finance a serious seat at the table so that the majority of the $300 trillion stock of global capital can return to its true roots – serving society and the environment.

Management and sustainability

Our current institutions and economic models are designed around neo-classical economics and our current model of innovation is contradictory to sustainable development. The role of management is to provide an enabling environment for innovation to flourish from the bottom-up, to build bridges between sustainability and finance. Governments and the private sector must give sustainable finance a serious seat at the table so that the majority of the $300 trillion stock of global capital can return to its true roots – serving society and the environment.

ESGTree offers advanced ESG data management solutions harnessing the power of the cloud. Our automated platform is specifically geared to help private equity (PE) and venture capital (VC) firms manage their ESG data collection, analysis and reporting needs. Additional features such as our carbon calculator, benchmarking technology, and other trends and analysis features make ESGTree one of the most advanced SaaS solutions to ESG reporting for private investors.

Summary

Share:

What are the original roots of financial institutions?

Who should finance serve?

What is the purpose of finance in the asset management industry?

What is the role of management in sustainable finance?

Categories
ESGTREE

ESG Is Here to Stay!

ESG Is Here to Stay!

Share:

By 2025, ESG assets are estimated to exceed USD$50 trillion. In other words, one third of assets under management (AUM) will be classified as ESG assets in the next three years.

Some recent developments spurring the push for ESG include:

  • In 2020, the Big Four accounting firms launched a set of unified metrics on ESG disclosures. The same year, the Chartered Financial Association (CFA) Institute unveiled its first-ever global consultation on ESG.
  • In March 2021, the European Union enacted its Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) to regulate what can be legally labelled a “green” financial product. More recently, it is in the process of ironing out its rulebook on what constitutes a sustainable investment per sector.
  • The COP26 climate summit in November 2021 established the new International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) to regulate ESG disclosure standards, with offices to be opened in Montreal and Frankfurt.

Benefits of ESG

The way things are going, ESG integration into financial markets may one day be so seamless that “ESG investing” will become simple investing.

While a healthy skepticism remains over greenwashing – falsely claiming investments or products to be sustainable using misleading information – it is nevertheless in a company’s best interests to incorporate ESG with sincerity. The data reveals why.

The University of Oxford and Arabesque Partners found that, of the 200 studies they reviewed on sustainability and corporate performance, 90% showed that strong ESG policies were correlated with lower cost of capital; 88% showed that they resulted in better operational performance; and 80% showed stock price to positively correlate with good ESG practices. Moreover, the Harvard Business Review says firms with strong ESG credentials have a greater competitive advantage, manage risk better, encourage more innovation, build customer loyalty and attract and retain better talent.

Investors are paying attention

When it comes to reporting and disclosure, ESG reporting among S&P 500 companies grew by 400% in ten years. Ernst and Young’s Institutional Investor Survey 2020 revealed that 98% of institutional investors considered non-financial disclosures in their decision-making, up from around 60% in 2016. For private capital markets, over 50% of surveyed private equity firms reported that they took ESG into account for price negotiations and valuations during mergers and acquisitions.

These numbers are telling us something important. Over the next five to 10 years, companies, investors, financial institutions and governments which do not exercise robust ESG practices will not be taken seriously on the world stage. It’s time to rise to the occasion.

ESGTree is your one-stop-shop to collecting, analyzing and reporting ESG data. Built with the needs of investors in mind, our cloud-based ESG data reporting platform is designed entirely around providing customizable metrics and user experiences. Our ESG reporting tools are purpose built to serve the needs of seasoned ESG managers as well as those entering the ESG world for the first time.

Who Should the Economy Really Serve?

Who Should the Economy Really Serve?

The rallying cry of the American Revolution – no taxation without representation – is today taken as self-evident but deserves a re-examination in light of the climate crisis and sustainable…

Summary

Share:

What are the current ESG regulations?

What is greenwashing?

What are the benefits of sustainable practices for corporations?

Categories
ESGTREE

Why Should Private Equity and Venture Capital Care About ESG?

Why Should Private Equity and Venture Capital Care About ESG?

Share:

Let’s cut to the chase: ESG is here to stay. In a COVID-emerging world, we ignore it at our own risk.

From raging wildfires to catalyzing incidents of social injustice and the so-called Great Resignation, one aspect of our “new normal” is heightened corporate accountability, coupled with an increased need for risk mitigation, in the form of ESG compliance.

In contrast to public markets, private equity (PE) and venture capital (VC) markets have a direct responsibility for the companies or start-ups they invest in, often holding board seats in these companies. This direct-stakes approach to raising capital, along with responsibility to their own boards members who typically have considerable wealth at risk, means PE and VC firms will be held to a far higher standard of accountability as the mainstreaming of ESG continues.

Oncoming ESG regulations

European nations have so far led the call to this mainstreaming. The UK has mandated climate-related disclosures as of April 2022, and the EU enacted the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) in March 2021 to combat greenwashing by providing rules on what can and cannot be categorized a “green” financial product. Currently, the EU is in the process of finalizing its “green investment taxonomy” to define which investments can legally be labelled green. PE and VC players on this side of the pond have the opportunity to remain ahead of the game before North America catches up, as it is already beginning to do. Canada has just announced plans to set up a framework for mandatory climate-related disclosures, and the newly formed International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) will be taking up an office in Montreal.

Why are VC firms well-suited to implement ESG?

VC firms, in particular, can be especially well-suited to remain ahead of the regulatory curve. By investing in start-ups and disruptive technologies, they have the opportunity to integrate ESG into their portfolios from the get-go during the early stages of a company’s life cycle. By weaving ESG into the very culture and fabric of start-ups, which by their nature are incubators of innovation, VCs are in a unique position to shape the post-COVID economy.

Given political, social and, critically, climate volatility characteristic of our still young 21st century, genuine ESG credentials will become critical in strengthening a portfolio’s ability to weather a storm, encourage longevity and minimize risk of all kinds. Thus, for institutional investors, ESG performance will play a not insignificant factor in price negotiations and valuations. In fact, in a recent KMPG survey of private equity general partners worldwide, 54% had reduced a bid after carrying out ESG due diligence, while 34% increased one. Firms that ignore ESG will suffer down the line in their fundraising efforts or if limited partners inquire about their ESG credentials. Reputationally, millennial consumers (along with Gen Z, who will come into their own in the next two decades or so) have repeatedly reported themselves as willing to boycott companies on poor ESG grounds. It can all go downhill with a meme.

While the ESG pressure has been slowly building on public markets over time, the PE and VC spheres are still relatively new to the game. As such, a dearth of market tools or advisory services exist to cater to the needs of investors who will now face additional scrutiny and pressure to collaborate with ESG forward companies.

So where do private capital markets begin? Data.

ESGTree advises that PE and VC firms begin with a baseline collection of solid, reliable and verifiable data before crafting strategies and policies. In our experience, firms often dive into sustainability reporting in the absence of both proper data and an ESG strategy on which it should be based (and low emissions industries should nevertheless collect robust environmental data as well). Data is the edifice upon which real ESG rests. Much has been written about the dismal – but evolving – state of ESG scoring and ratings by ESG ratings agencies. A company can receive wildly differing ESG scores based on the provider. The data that ratings are based on is self-reported, opaque and sketchy, and in the absence of any meaningful benchmarking analysis, these scores lack meaning. In the words of a Tufts University professor, “garbage in, garbage out.” Hardly a stable foundation on which to enact policy.

Based on this data, a company can extract meaningful ESG metrics to see where it stands. Benchmarking these metrics against global standards such as those published by the Sustainability Accountability Standards Board (SASB) can provide a barometer on whether a portfolio is performing well, averagely or poorly on ESG. The United Nations Principles of Responsible Investment (UNPRI) has also issued a number of frameworks and toolkits related to private capital markets and ESG.

So far, ESG is largely viewed as a hurdle, albeit one to the tune of trillions. For the PE and VC industries, it can be a shining opportunity to position themselves and shape the future.

ESGTree provides powerful data solutions to help private equity (PE) and venture capital (VC) firms gather, collect, analyze, benchmark and report their ESG data and that of their portfolio companies. Our carbon calculator, customizable and automated ESG frameworks, multi-level report viewing, trends analysis dashboard, and other features aimed to make ESG a value creation tool rather than a reporting burden.

Click here to learn more about our ESGTree’s data solution for Private Equity & Venture Capital.

ESG Is Here to Stay!

ESG Is Here to Stay!

By 2025, ESG assets are estimated to exceed USD$50 trillion. In other words, one third of Assets Under Management (AUM) will be classified as ESG assets in the next three…

Summary

Share:

Why are PE/VC firms more accountable to ESG?

Why are VC firms well suited to implement ESG?Why is EDCI significant?

What are some existing ESG regulations?

Why are VC firms well suited to implement ESG?

Accelerate ESG reporting for investors, while
creating value for portfolio companies.

Categories
ESGTREE

What Does the Rise of ESG Mean for Impact Investing?

What Does the Rise of ESG Mean For Impact Investing?

Share:

By market size alone, impact investing might be far smaller than ESG investing, but its unique profile makes it a critical part of sustainable finance. ESG assets are on course to hit USD$50 trillion over the next three years, while impact investments are gauged to hover around USD$1 trillion. This begs the question: as ESG continues its meteoric rise, what will happen to impact investing?

The question is a relevant one. There is much ESG can learn from impact investing. While the former concerns itself with risk, the latter aims to create a positive net change. If impact investing were to disappear altogether, the pursuit of ESG may be left to the mercy of pure capitalism. In other words, it is easier to convince mainstream investors to “do no harm” than to actively seek to do good, and it will only become easier as the ESG industry grows. This will limit the growth of impact investing.

Besides this fundamental difference in the aim of the two types of investing, other telling distinctions are:

  • Impact investing usually involves private equity-style transactions, whereas the bulk of ESG activity involves publicly traded company stocks or mutual funds. Impact investments are almost always made into companies (or funds) through mergers and acquisitions transactions directly, without the use of retail or commercial banking platforms that are available to the public.
  • Impact investing is most often associated with investments made from the Global North going to the Global South. This does not mean that impact investing cannot be carried out domestically within developed economies. Rather, the surge of contemporary impact investing, which began around 2009, is by and large directed towards developing economies and sustainable development.
  • ESG investing is driven by traditional finance entities such as institutional investors, pension funds, banks, insurance companies, asset managers and private investment funds. Impact investing is led by sustainable development-driven organizations such as development finance institutions (DFIs), multilateral and bilateral aid agencies, social impact investors, foundations and nonprofits.

The major actors involved in these two types of investment are critical in assessing whether impact investing will, in fact, be swallowed by ESG investing. The total amount of wealth on the ESG side is far higher than the wealth managed by impact investors, and it is also managed through means more accessible to the general public. As such, it will only continue to become more and more mainstream.

The Future Of Impact Investing

None of this is to say that impact investing is defunct. Rather, it will remain a niche market with its own agenda and audience. This audience remains small because it comprises investors who have a clear and firm intention that their money should not only “do no harm” but do “measurable good.”


In this light, impact investing is likely to be eaten up by ESG investing in mainstream markets, while maintaining its small though loyal following on the fringe. This is particularly so as the world moves closer towards the sustainable development goals (SDGs) set for 2030. Beyond that, only time will tell how impact investing might find a place within the larger ESG world and a refreshed United Nations framework for sustainable development. 

ESGTree is uniquely placed in that we work with both ESG & impact investors – and gain valuable insights from both. Private equity (PE) & venture capital (VC) firms, corporations & financial institutions are strongly advised to harness the power of the cloud and automate their ESG reporting process to satisfy investors and reap the full benefits of strong ESG policies.

Summary

Share:

What is the difference between ESG investing and impact investing?

Who are the main actors in ESG investing and impact investing?

What will happen to impact investing?

Categories
ESGTREE

How Do I Integrate ESG Into My Business?

How Do I Integrate ESG Into My Business?

Share:

By now, it’s well established that ESG integration is not only good for the world but also good for business – a net win, in other words.

Indeed, a study by McKinsey concluded that “the value at stake from sustainability (ESG) concerns can be as high as 70% of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation.” Put another way, up to 70% of a business’s potential earnings could be lost to ESG risks.

In a nutshell, ESG integration is the process of managing environmental, social and governance risks that might negatively impact companies and their stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, and society and the environment at large.

ESG Integration Strategy

To begin the process of integrating ESG into the daily running of your business, you should start by asking three simple but fundamental questions:

  • What is the environmental impact of my business on water, waste, energy and carbon emissions and how can I minimize that impact?
  • How can my business maximize the quality of life for its people (i.e., its employees, management, suppliers and community), particularly for marginalized groups (such as women or minorities)?
  • Is my business compliant with all government regulations, internal policies and codes of conduct?

ESG Integration Strategy

The following questions apply to all industries. One may think low-impact sectors, such as tech, are immune to these concerns. But what about those ten international business trips that management takes per year, which collectively produce over 20 tons of carbon dioxide?

Benefits of ESG

Asking ESG questions yields several important benefits to a business. Smart ESG policies result in employees who are more engaged and responsible, positively affecting retention rates and lowering the cost of training new hires. These questions are also, in essence, a method of risk and cost management. Every major industry, be it agri-business, textiles, chemicals, manufacturing or transportation, has natural resource risks tied to it.

Prioritizing water and energy conservation and waste minimization decreases costs associated with these processes simply through using natural resources more responsibly. Risks associated with human rights might be less systematic, but when they do occur, they can have a huge impact – a major sexual harassment or discrimination related scandal, for example, can deeply affect a company’s reputation and morale.

Integrating ESG into your business operations does not have to be daunting. Rather, it is an opportunity to go back to basics, to revisit your company from the ground up and ask those fundamental questions of responsibility, resourcefulness, and community.

In addition to ESGTree’s SaaS data platform, our ESG consulting and advisory services can help businesses – from private equity (PE) and venture capital (VC) firms, financial institutions, corporations and others – begin the process of ESG integration and strategy. ESG does not have to be a daunting process. By understanding the power of data, asking the right questions and incorporating automated data solutions, all businesses can reap the benefits of ESG while satisfying investors.

Click here to learn more about ESGTree’s ESG Data Management & Reporting Software for Financial Institutions

Summary

Share:

What is ESG integration?

What are the benefits of ESG integration?

How to begin the process of integrating ESG?